Posted by joshhemming on November 11, 2008, 3:34 pm
I've been paying around $5.00 a month in fees and taxes just for the
priviledge of having AT&T Long Distance service on my land line. I
never use their LD service, preferring to use prepaid calling cards
instead. I'd like to drop the long distance part of my AT&T phone
service to save those wasted bucks, but keep the land line for local
calls and continue using calling cards for LD. But I'm not sure it's
possible:
If there is no long distance service for my land line, can I still
call toll-free 1-(8xx) numbers from it? I have to first call one of
those 800 numbers to place a calling card call.
And I'm assuming if I only have local service on my land line, I can
still RECEIVE long distance calls....is this correct?
Posted by Al Bundy on November 11, 2008, 4:38 pm
joshhemm...@fastmail.fm wrote:
> I've been paying around $5.00 a month in fees and taxes just for the
> priviledge of having AT&T Long Distance service on my land line. I
> never use their LD service, preferring to use prepaid calling cards
> instead. I'd like to drop the long distance part of my AT&T phone
> service to save those wasted bucks, but keep the land line for local
> calls and continue using calling cards for LD. But I'm not sure it's
> possible:
> If there is no long distance service for my land line, can I still
> call toll-free 1-(8xx) numbers from it? I have to first call one of
> those 800 numbers to place a calling card call.
> And I'm assuming if I only have local service on my land line, I can
> still RECEIVE long distance calls....is this correct?
Sure you can. I have done that for as long as possible. When I need to
make a LD call out I use one of those 10-10 dial-arounds. The rates
are pretty good. Incoming calls are not affected by not taking the
AT&T LD. I also use the old pulse dial system, known as rotary. My
phone has buttons and dials the pulse. If the destination has a menu
that requires a touch tone phone, I switch the phone to tone instead
of pulse and the menu options work fine. I switch back after the
call.
The phone companies like to charge more for touch tone service when it
actually saves them money over accepting a pulse. They are caught in a
marketing conundrum and can't/won't change it. I suppose they could
continue to charge extra for the touch tone and a premium over that
for rotary service. Please don't give them any ideas. They are
overpaid already.
Posted by Rod Speed on November 11, 2008, 4:52 pm
> joshhemm...@fastmail.fm wrote:
>> I've been paying around $5.00 a month in fees and taxes just for the
>> priviledge of having AT&T Long Distance service on my land line. I
>> never use their LD service, preferring to use prepaid calling cards
>> instead. I'd like to drop the long distance part of my AT&T phone
>> service to save those wasted bucks, but keep the land line for local
>> calls and continue using calling cards for LD. But I'm not sure it's
>> possible:
>>
>> If there is no long distance service for my land line, can I still
>> call toll-free 1-(8xx) numbers from it? I have to first call one of
>> those 800 numbers to place a calling card call.
>>
>> And I'm assuming if I only have local service on my land line, I can
>> still RECEIVE long distance calls....is this correct?
> Sure you can. I have done that for as long as possible. When I need to
> make a LD call out I use one of those 10-10 dial-arounds. The rates
> are pretty good. Incoming calls are not affected by not taking the
> AT&T LD. I also use the old pulse dial system, known as rotary. My
> phone has buttons and dials the pulse. If the destination has a menu
> that requires a touch tone phone, I switch the phone to tone instead
> of pulse and the menu options work fine. I switch back after the call.
> The phone companies like to charge more for touch tone service
> when it actually saves them money over accepting a pulse.
No it doesnt.
> They are caught in a marketing conundrum
No they arent.
> and can't/won't change it. I suppose they could continue to charge
> extra for the touch tone and a premium over that for rotary service.
> Please don't give them any ideas. They are overpaid already.
Posted by Al Bundy on November 12, 2008, 3:08 pm
Rod Speed wrote:
> > joshhemm...@fastmail.fm wrote:
> >> I've been paying around $5.00 a month in fees and taxes just for the
> >> priviledge of having AT&T Long Distance service on my land line. I
> >> never use their LD service, preferring to use prepaid calling cards
> >> instead. I'd like to drop the long distance part of my AT&T phone
> >> service to save those wasted bucks, but keep the land line for local
> >> calls and continue using calling cards for LD. But I'm not sure it's
> >> possible:
> >>
> >> If there is no long distance service for my land line, can I still
> >> call toll-free 1-(8xx) numbers from it? I have to first call one of
> >> those 800 numbers to place a calling card call.
> >>
> >> And I'm assuming if I only have local service on my land line, I can
> >> still RECEIVE long distance calls....is this correct?
> >
> > Sure you can. I have done that for as long as possible. When I need to
> > make a LD call out I use one of those 10-10 dial-arounds. The rates
> > are pretty good. Incoming calls are not affected by not taking the
> > AT&T LD. I also use the old pulse dial system, known as rotary. My
> > phone has buttons and dials the pulse. If the destination has a menu
> > that requires a touch tone phone, I switch the phone to tone instead
> > of pulse and the menu options work fine. I switch back after the call.
> > The phone companies like to charge more for touch tone service
> > when it actually saves them money over accepting a pulse.
> No it doesnt.
DTMF code is handled more efficiently partly due less need for a
buffer between pulsed numbers. The result is a faster call with less
line time overall. It adds up over millions of calls.
Posted by Ken Lay on November 12, 2008, 9:12 pm
In article
> DTMF code is handled more efficiently partly due less need for a
> buffer between pulsed numbers. The result is a faster call with less
> line time overall. It adds up over millions of calls.
Yeah, especially when those millions of calls are all made by one person.
--
Everybody lies. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney just suck at it.
> priviledge of having AT&T Long Distance service on my land line. I
> never use their LD service, preferring to use prepaid calling cards
> instead. I'd like to drop the long distance part of my AT&T phone
> service to save those wasted bucks, but keep the land line for local
> calls and continue using calling cards for LD. But I'm not sure it's
> possible:
> If there is no long distance service for my land line, can I still
> call toll-free 1-(8xx) numbers from it? I have to first call one of
> those 800 numbers to place a calling card call.
> And I'm assuming if I only have local service on my land line, I can
> still RECEIVE long distance calls....is this correct?