Posted by lenona321 on January 25, 2009, 4:18 pm
18 mainly negative comments so far - and plenty more elsewhere, I
hope. Shall we write to our newspapers and make it clear we mean
business?
Yes, I've heard the argument that we can't afford to have any
country's birth rate drop below a certain level - but obviously, no
family can afford to have more children than it can afford! Not to
mention that little issue of people maybe NOT WANTING children in the
first place? Don't we have enough children languishing in foster care
already? Shouldn't we be working on how to keep the country going
without a young "slave" population - maybe through greater personal
frugality?
http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2009/01/23/contraceptives-not-the-kind-of=
-stimulus-boehner-can-believe-in/
First paragraphs:
Barack Obama’s $825 billion plan to boost the recession-bound U.S.
economy has some elements that, well, aren’t the sort of
stimulus that House Minority Leader John Boehner says he can believe
in.
“I’m concerned about the size of the package, and I’m concerned about
some of the spending that’s in there,” Boehner complained Friday after
a meeting at White House.
“How can you spend hundreds of millions of dollars on contraceptives?
How does that stimulate the economy?”
(click to read the rest)
Lenona.
Posted by Rod Speed on January 25, 2009, 7:26 pm
lenona321@yahoo.com wrote:
> 18 mainly negative comments so far - and plenty more elsewhere, I hope.
> Shall we write to our newspapers and make it clear we mean business?
> Yes, I've heard the argument that we can't afford to have any country's
> birth rate drop below a certain level - but obviously, no family can afford
> to have more children than it can afford! Not to mention that little issue
> of people maybe NOT WANTING children in the first place? Don't we
> have enough children languishing in foster care already?
Nope, if we did, we wouldnt see so many buying kids from 3rd world countrys.
> Shouldn't we be working on how to keep the country going without a
> young "slave" population - maybe through greater personal frugality?
Doesnt work, you end up with no one paying taxes and all the geriatrics starving.
>
http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2009/01/23/contraceptives-not-the-kind-of-stimulus-boehner-can-believe-in/
> First paragraphs:
> Barack Obama’s $825 billion plan to boost the recession-bound U.S.
> economy has some elements that, well, aren’t the sort of stimulus that
> House Minority Leader John Boehner says he can believe in.
> “I’m concerned about the size of the package, and I’m concerned about
> some of the spending that’s in there,” Boehner complained Friday after
> a meeting at White House.
> “How can you spend hundreds of millions of dollars on contraceptives?
> How does that stimulate the economy?”
Someone has to make them, stupid.
> (click to read the rest)
I clicked there and nothing happened. I wanna refund.
Posted by The Real Bev on January 26, 2009, 8:24 pm
Rod Speed wrote:
> lenona321@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> ... Don't we
>> have enough children languishing in foster care already?
>
> Nope, if we did, we wouldnt see so many buying kids from 3rd world countrys.
Yes, but those are NEW children and the adopting parents can feel good because
they're giving a NEW life to this NEW little child from far away. The locals
are just partially-broken ghetto kids and probably have diseases, deformities
and lice.
>> Shouldn't we be working on how to keep the country going without a
>> young "slave" population - maybe through greater personal frugality?
Apparently they don't make very good slaves...
> Doesnt work, you end up with no one paying taxes and all the geriatrics
starving.
>
>>
http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2009/01/23/contraceptives-not-the-kind-of-stimulus-boehner-can-believe-in/
>
>> First paragraphs:
>
>> Barack Obama’s $825 billion plan to boost the recession-bound U.S.
>> economy has some elements that, well, aren’t the sort of stimulus that
>> House Minority Leader John Boehner says he can believe in.
>
>> “I’m concerned about the size of the package, and I’m concerned about
>> some of the spending that’s in there,” Boehner complained Friday after
>> a meeting at White House.
>
>> “How can you spend hundreds of millions of dollars on contraceptives?
>> How does that stimulate the economy?”
>
> Someone has to make them, stupid.
It's mind-boggling that there's an official anti-contraceptive ideology not
related to the Catholic church. Surely preventing the birth of unwanted
children is a GOOD thing, no matter whose children they are. I regard it as an
investment, not an expense.
--
Cheers, Bev
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
"The almost universal access to higher education here in the US has
ruined a lot of potentially good manual laborers." -- Bob Hunt
Posted by Marsha on January 26, 2009, 8:32 pm
The Real Bev wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> lenona321@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> ... Don't we
>>> have enough children languishing in foster care already?
>>
>> Nope, if we did, we wouldnt see so many buying kids from 3rd world
>> countrys.
>
> Yes, but those are NEW children and the adopting parents can feel good
> because they're giving a NEW life to this NEW little child from far
> away. The locals are just partially-broken ghetto kids and probably
> have diseases, deformities and lice.
>
And, NEW children are all the rage with celebrities.
Marsha/Ohio
Posted by Rod Speed on January 27, 2009, 2:19 pm
The Real Bev wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> lenona321@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> Don't we have enough children languishing in foster care already?
>> Nope, if we did, we wouldnt see so many buying kids from 3rd world countrys.
> Yes, but those are NEW children and the adopting parents can feel good because
they're giving a NEW life to this NEW
> little child from far away. The locals are just partially-broken ghetto kids
and probably have diseases, deformities
> and lice.
It happens with the kids from 3rd world countrys too. That 7 up doco series had
one on russians and one of them ended up in the US with the same problems.
>>> Shouldn't we be working on how to keep the country going without a
>>> young "slave" population - maybe through greater personal frugality?
> Apparently they don't make very good slaves...
>> Doesnt work, you end up with no one paying taxes and all the geriatrics
starving.
>>>
http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2009/01/23/contraceptives-not-the-kind-of-stimulus-boehner-can-believe-in/
>>> First paragraphs:
>>> Barack Obama’s $825 billion plan to boost the recession-bound U.S.
>>> economy has some elements that, well, aren’t the sort of stimulus
>>> that House Minority Leader John Boehner says he can believe in.
>>> “I’m concerned about the size of the package, and I’m concerned
>>> about some of the spending that’s in there,” Boehner complained
>>> Friday after a meeting at White House.
>>> “How can you spend hundreds of millions of dollars on
>>> contraceptives? How does that stimulate the economy?”
>> Someone has to make them, stupid.
> It's mind-boggling that there's an official anti-contraceptive ideology not
related to the Catholic church.
Nothing that the god botherers get up to ever boggles my mind.
After all, it was them that burnt each other at the stake very enthusiastically.
In fact it got so bad at one time in germany that the buildings on the downwind
side of
the town square ended up with considerable deposits of human fat on them, quite
literally.
> Surely preventing the birth of unwanted children is a GOOD thing, no matter
whose children they are.
Clearly the silly old farts in Rome feel otherwise.
Its not too surprising that some other god botherers agree with them.
In fact plenty of moslems feel the same way.
> I regard it as an investment, not an expense.
Sure, but you arent a brainless god botherer, just a gorgon with a horned
helmet.
> Shall we write to our newspapers and make it clear we mean business?
> Yes, I've heard the argument that we can't afford to have any country's
> birth rate drop below a certain level - but obviously, no family can afford
> to have more children than it can afford! Not to mention that little issue
> of people maybe NOT WANTING children in the first place? Don't we
> have enough children languishing in foster care already?