Posted by Devo on February 27, 2009, 11:12 am
We bought a used fridge and did it have a clogged cooling system. Dust
bunnies
covering what should be a radiator. I had to use compressed air and a
vacuum..
And a brush to dislodge it all. You might check your fridge for da
bunnies.
Your fridge will last longer and use less electricity.
--
It's amazing what you can do. If...
you put your mind to it.
Posted by Rod Speed on February 27, 2009, 2:04 pm
Devo wrote:
> We bought a used fridge and did it have a clogged cooling system.
> Dust bunnies covering what should be a radiator. I had to use
> compressed air and a vacuum..
> And a brush to dislodge it all. You might check your fridge for da bunnies.
> Your fridge will last longer
Nope.
> and use less electricity.
Not necessarily.
Posted by Vic Smith on February 27, 2009, 10:07 pm
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:56:39 -0800 (PST), phil scott
>> Devo wrote:
>> > We bought a used fridge and did it have a clogged cooling system.
>> > Dust bunnies covering what should be a radiator. I had to use
>> > compressed air and a vacuum..
>> > And a brush to dislodge it all. You might check your fridge for da
bunnies.
>> > Your fridge will last longer
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> > and use less electricity.
>>
>> Not necessarily.
>incorrecto turd breath.
Thermodynamic laws don't mean much when you just want to be
disagreeable.
--Vic
Posted by Vic Smith on March 1, 2009, 2:31 pm
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:33:33 -0800 (PST), phil scott
>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:56:39 -0800 (PST), phil scott
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> Devo wrote:
>> >> > We bought a used fridge and did it have a clogged cooling system.
>> >> > Dust bunnies covering what should be a radiator. I had to use
>> >> > compressed air and a vacuum..
>> >> > And a brush to dislodge it all. You might check your fridge for da
bunnies.
>> >> > Your fridge will last longer
>>
>> >> Nope.
>>
>> >> > and use less electricity.
>>
>> >> Not necessarily.
>>
>> >incorrecto turd breath.
>>
>> Thermodynamic laws don't mean much when you just want to be
>> disagreeable.
>>
>> --Vic- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>Im a Mech engr with thermodynamic specialties... the loss of
>efficiency though is not due to thermodyamics however but to loss of
>volumentric efficiency in the compressor as the compression ratio
>increases (due to dirty condenser),,, the figure in usual ranges is a
>3% loss of efficiency for each degee rise in condensing temperature
>above ideal ranges. (thats because of refrigerant re-expansion at the
>top of the stroke, precluding suction until the cylinder pressure
>falls below the evaporator pressure)... efficiency can easly drop to
>zero... you get no suction gas cooling prior to that, and the
>compressor goes off on its internal temperature overload.. (same is
>true for roller, and rotary compressors).
Glad I gave you an opportunity to talk about volumetric efficiency.
Of course I don't what that is like you do, and won't even try to get
into a chicken/egg type argument.
All I know is dust is an insulator and slows heat removal from
compressed refrigerant gasses.
Surprised Rod didn't know even that.
Same applies to computer component heat.
Seems he would argue about sweat not removing heat just to be arguing
about something.
Don't reply to this Rod. Just flush it where it belongs.
--Vic
Posted by Rod Speed on March 1, 2009, 4:01 pm
Vic Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:33:33 -0800 (PST), phil scott
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:56:39 -0800 (PST), phil scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Devo wrote:
>>>>>> We bought a used fridge and did it have a clogged cooling system.
>>>>>> Dust bunnies covering what should be a radiator. I had to use
>>>>>> compressed air and a vacuum..
>>>>>> And a brush to dislodge it all. You might check your fridge for
>>>>>> da bunnies. Your fridge will last longer
>>>
>>>>> Nope.
>>>
>>>>>> and use less electricity.
>>>
>>>>> Not necessarily.
>>>
>>>> incorrecto turd breath.
>>>
>>> Thermodynamic laws don't mean much when you just want to be
>>> disagreeable.
>>>
>>> --Vic- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Im a Mech engr with thermodynamic specialties... the loss of
>> efficiency though is not due to thermodyamics however but to loss of
>> volumentric efficiency in the compressor as the compression ratio
>> increases (due to dirty condenser),,, the figure in usual ranges is
>> a 3% loss of efficiency for each degee rise in condensing temperature
>> above ideal ranges. (thats because of refrigerant re-expansion at
>> the top of the stroke, precluding suction until the cylinder pressure
>> falls below the evaporator pressure)... efficiency can easly drop to
>> zero... you get no suction gas cooling prior to that, and the
>> compressor goes off on its internal temperature overload.. (same is
>> true for roller, and rotary compressors).
>>
> Glad I gave you an opportunity to talk about volumetric efficiency.
> Of course I don't what that is like you do, and won't even try to get
> into a chicken/egg type argument.
> All I know is dust is an insulator and slows heat removal from
> compressed refrigerant gasses.
> Surprised Rod didn't know even that.
Corse I did.
You're too stupid to be able to grasp that its perfectly possible to design a
system that works well with the normal level of dust that will accumulate.
> Same applies to computer component heat.
Nope. Its also perfectly possible to design the cooling system so it
works well with the normal level of dust that inevitably accumulates.
Nothing is gained by having it run cooler than it needs to be.
> Seems he would argue about sweat not removing heat just to be arguing about
something.
Just rub the noses of fools like you in the basics.
> Don't reply to this Rod. Just flush it where it belongs.
Go and fuck yourself, again.
XML site map
> Dust bunnies covering what should be a radiator. I had to use
> compressed air and a vacuum..
> And a brush to dislodge it all. You might check your fridge for da bunnies.
> Your fridge will last longer
Nope.
> and use less electricity.