Posted by BIGtitties on January 21, 2011, 2:21 pm
I doubt I'll own my 2010 Accent 4-door long enough to determine
longevity/depreciation.
I bought a new 2010 Accent two months ago, but, being old-school,
didn't think to look
for or ask about a TEMPERATURE GAUGE at time of purchase.
And the salesman didn't tell me about this missing instrument,
either. Since that day he's been hard to contact.
Intentional?
I'll probably never know.
But the absence of an in-dash analog gauge has made me uncomfortable,
and skeptical. Like what ELSE DOESN'T this motor vehicle have?
Posted by Vic Smith on January 23, 2011, 4:48 pm
>You're right that most people, including the OP, don't notice the
>gauges. Most don't care either. They only think that they care. The only
>thing I care about is a working AC. If that works good and the car is
>half-way decent, I'm happy.
Disagree. When starting off on a frigid day I look at my temp gauge
so I know I can stop shivering.
--Vic
Posted by Ed Pawlowski on January 23, 2011, 5:47 pm
?
> Disagree. When starting off on a frigid day I look at my temp gauge
> so I know I can stop shivering.
> --Vic
You'd have loved my Buick Regal. The gauge would peg hot as soon as you
turned the key. No shiver needed.
Posted by C. E. White on January 25, 2011, 7:46 am
> My GMC Sierra has all the gauges and I keep an eye on them.
But how many are in fact "real" gauges? GM does still include a real
pressure transducer for oil pressure (or at least they did the last time I
looked at GM Truck Manual), BUT the dash oil pressure gauge is not connected
directly to the transducer. The signal for all of the gauges is routed
trough the PCM, so GM can play the same sort of games with the dash reading
as anyone else. Maybe the reading are "real time" or maybe not (hard to tell
from the wiring diagrams). But at least they do gather actual oil pressure
information beyond some and none - although given the reliability of most
cheap transducers I am not sure there is any practical difference.
Ed
Posted by C. E. White on January 25, 2011, 11:12 am
> > My GMC Sierra has all the gauges and I keep an eye on them.
> But how many are in fact "real" gauges? GM does still include a real
> pressure transducer for oil pressure (or at least they did the last time I
> looked at GM Truck Manual), BUT the dash oil pressure gauge is not
> connected
> directly to the transducer. The signal for all of the gauges is routed
> trough the PCM, so GM can play the same sort of games with the dash
> reading
> as anyone else. Maybe the reading are "real time" or maybe not (hard to
> tell
> from the wiring diagrams). But at least they do gather actual oil pressure
> information beyond some and none - although given the reliability of most
> cheap transducers I am not sure there is any practical difference.
> Ed
> I know what you are saying is true on some cars, but I have verified
> the gauges on my Sierra and they are pretty dam accurate at all ranges.
The way GMC describes the gauges on the 2011 models leaves a lot of wiggle
room. They say:
"Instrumentation: Analog cluster with speedometer, fuel level, engine
temperature and tachometer. On 1500 SLE , SLT and Denali models, includes
voltmeter and oil pressure indicators."
Indicators seems to imply that they might not be real analog gauges....
Ed
>gauges. Most don't care either. They only think that they care. The only
>thing I care about is a working AC. If that works good and the car is
>half-way decent, I'm happy.