Re: What kitchen appliances are really WORTH IT?

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
please rate
this thread
Posted by Rod Speed on September 11, 2006, 5:49 am
 
replies@to.here wrote

Some do, some buy breadmix.


What I said.



Posted by Rod Speed on September 11, 2006, 6:03 am
 

it will be healthier

Nope, but a crock pot simplifys things.


loaf, for instance...),

That isnt necessarily better.


Well, actually, two

In spades when breadmix is used, just toss in the mix,
then the water and the yeast and press the button.

Leaves doing it by hand for dead.


And a hell of a lot less effort too.

I dont even bother to wash anything, the coated tin in the bread
machine is so clean that there isnt any point in washing it.


But lots of the other

sure if this applies

Yes it does.


No they dont.


space for them

Overkill in my opinion.


Yeah, me too. I'm not stupid enough to wash clothes by hand either.


I just use tap water, dont even bother to put water in the fridge.


Dont eat waffles.


to heat up

I dont bother with the one I got free.

I'd add

10. toaster -  much prefer the automatic pop up when its done.

11. manual onion chopper. Too much farting around doing it with a knife.

12. freezer. Much more convenient to make much more than a single
meal and freeze the rest in meal sized portions with stuff like curry etc.

13. Digital scales. So cheap its pointless doing without one.


Dunno, I dont fry anymore, but when I did, I didnt bother to clean
it out every time it got used, just when the fat had been used a bit.

And I only ever ditched the old fat and added new fat, didnt bother to wash it.


Yep, and rather more convenient too.


I prefer a conventional grill for that, comes with the oven.



Posted by Gordon on September 12, 2006, 12:53 am
 @individual.net:


Long walk is part of the gift.


Posted by Chloe on September 11, 2006, 8:30 am
 
I don't like most foods prepared in a crockpot, but I do make a couple kinds
of soup and sauces in mine. In theory you should be able to get the same
effect from a stovetop burner, but you'd have to be lurking over it and
stirring for 6 or 8 hours--especially if what you're preparing is a thick
consistency. The advantage of the crockpot is that you can leave it for a
full workday and come home to prepared, piping hot comfort food.

I've never even thought about owning an electric skillet, though. And I
agree with the other poster about the Fry Baby (which I got for free). It
just doesn't get hot enough to approach the utility of a "real" deep fat
fryer.




Posted by Marie Braden on September 11, 2006, 7:18 pm
 Because I live in a studio apartment without a stove, This thread
immediately piqued my interest. Granted, when I was still married, I
was a gadget queen,but the ones I've found essential in a no-stove
life have been:
1. microwave--obviously, I gotta have a way to cook SOMETHING.
2. crockpot--I use this mainly for soups and stews, but it's a small
one so it cooks thoroughly within a couple of hours instead of the
all-dayness of the large one I used to have.
3. blender--I use this more rarely, but it's still v. useful for
chopping up a lot of ingredients at one time.
3. George Foreman "grill"--sometimes you want stuff that just doesn't
have that "microwaved" flavor.


This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date