Posted by max on December 3, 2008, 5:14 pm
> it's all over the blogs.
>
> http://dailykenoshan.com/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemidc&topicS329.msg574
> 74;topicseen
>
> http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm
>
> overnight fedex supreme court w/ your concerns; only way to reach them:
>
> http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId ‚449
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=supreme+court+obama+eligibility&aq=1&oq=s
> upreme+court+obama+eli
dipshit.
--
This signature can be appended to your outgoing mesages. Many people include in
their signatures contact information, and perhaps a joke or quotation.
Posted by Dave on December 3, 2008, 5:36 pm
> > it's all over the blogs.
> >
> >
http://dailykenoshan.com/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemidc&topicS329.msg5
74
> > 74;topicseen
> >
> > http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm
> >
> > overnight fedex supreme court w/ your concerns; only way to reach them:
> >
> > http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId ‚449
> >
> >
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=supreme+court+obama+eligibility&aq=1&oq
=s
> > upreme+court+obama+eli
> dipshit.
What? This is a real court case that the supremes are going to have to rule
on. I for one am interested in what the supremes have to say on the
atter. -Dave
Posted by Daniel T. on December 3, 2008, 8:18 pm
> >
> > > it's all over the blogs.
> > >
> > >
> http://dailykenoshan.com/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemidc&topicS329.msg5
> 74
> > > 74;topicseen
> > >
> > > http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm
> > >
> > > overnight fedex supreme court w/ your concerns; only way to reach them:
> > >
> > > http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId ‚449
> > >
> > >
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=supreme+court+obama+eligibility&aq=1&oq
> =s
> > > upreme+court+obama+eli
> >
> > dipshit.
> >
>
> What? This is a real court case that the supremes are going to have to rule
> on. I for one am interested in what the supremes have to say on the
> atter. -Dave
They already dismissed it.
Posted by Dave on December 4, 2008, 8:36 pm
> > What? This is a real court case that the supremes are going to have to
rule
> > on. I for one am interested in what the supremes have to say on the
> > atter. -Dave
> They already dismissed it.
You're confused. It was dismissed (wrongly) by a judge in PA. -Dave
Posted by Shawn Hirn on December 5, 2008, 12:50 am
> >
> >> >
> >> > > it's all over the blogs.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> http://dailykenoshan.com/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemidc&topicS329.msg
> >> 5
> >> 74
> >> > > 74;topicseen
> >> > >
> >> > > http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm
> >> > >
> >> > > overnight fedex supreme court w/ your concerns; only way to reach
> >> > > them:
> >> > >
> >> > > http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId ‚449
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=supreme+court+obama+eligibility&aq=1&o
> >> q
> >> =s
> >> > > upreme+court+obama+eli
> >> >
> >> > dipshit.
> >> >
> >>
> >> What? This is a real court case that the supremes are going to have to
> >> rule
> >> on. I for one am interested in what the supremes have to say on the
> >> atter. -Dave
> >
> > They already dismissed it.
>
> i think that was a federal judge. i don't think they're looking at this
> until friday
It was Justice Souter. Here's the link ...
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a391.htm
end of story.
XML site map
>
> http://dailykenoshan.com/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemidc&topicS329.msg574
> 74;topicseen
>
> http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm
>
> overnight fedex supreme court w/ your concerns; only way to reach them:
>
> http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId ‚449
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=supreme+court+obama+eligibility&aq=1&oq=s
> upreme+court+obama+eli