Posted by Napoleon on November 19, 2008, 8:38 am
An appropriate time of the year for this post.
I keep my thermostat at 59 from 8am to 5pm and 9pm to 6am.
From 6am to 8am and 5pm to 9pm the thermostat is kept at 64. Is this
more frugal than keeping the thermostat set at 62 the entire day?
Would it be more worthwhile to keep the thermostat set lower at night
or would you use more gas just getting it up to 64 from say 56? I use
natural gas to heat and I am in upstate NY.
What are your thermostat settings, where do you live, what do you use
to heat, and did you see a savings last year from lowering it at
night?
-N
Posted by Rod Speed on November 19, 2008, 2:41 pm
> An appropriate time of the year for this post.
> I keep my thermostat at 59 from 8am to 5pm and 9pm to 6am.
> From 6am to 8am and 5pm to 9pm the thermostat is kept at 64. Is
> this more frugal than keeping the thermostat set at 62 the entire day?
Should be, because you're at the higher temp for only 5 hours
a day and so the losses will be lower for the rest of the time.
It may be hard to see in the bill tho with such small temperature differences.
> Would it be more worthwhile to keep the thermostat set lower at night
Yes, because you would lose less heat during that time.
> or would you use more gas just getting it up to 64 from say 56?
No. You can get an effect like that with a heat pump, but not with gas.
> I use natural gas to heat and I am in upstate NY.
> What are your thermostat settings, where do you live, what do you use
> to heat, and did you see a savings last year from lowering it at night?
Posted by Dan Birchall on November 19, 2008, 7:03 pm
anarch@666yes.net (Napoleon) wrote:
> What are your thermostat settings,
I don't have a thermostat.
> where do you live,
Hawaii.
> what do you use to heat,
Heat?
--
"Infirm indeed are my bones, and the hair of my head doth glisten with
grey: but never am I unblest."
Posted by Nicik Name on November 20, 2008, 12:08 am
> An appropriate time of the year for this post.
> I keep my thermostat at 59 from 8am to 5pm and 9pm to 6am.
> From 6am to 8am and 5pm to 9pm the thermostat is kept at 64. Is this
> more frugal than keeping the thermostat set at 62 the entire day?
> Would it be more worthwhile to keep the thermostat set lower at night
> or would you use more gas just getting it up to 64 from say 56? I use
> natural gas to heat and I am in upstate NY.
> What are your thermostat settings, where do you live, what do you use
> to heat, and did you see a savings last year from lowering it at
> night?
Shut some rooms down if able in your house during the winter.
> -N
Posted by Dave Garland on November 20, 2008, 1:26 am
Napoleon wrote:
> I keep my thermostat at 59 from 8am to 5pm and 9pm to 6am.
> From 6am to 8am and 5pm to 9pm the thermostat is kept at 64. Is this
> more frugal than keeping the thermostat set at 62 the entire day?
Probably. Heat loss is proportional to the difference in temperature
between inside and outside.
> Would it be more worthwhile to keep the thermostat set lower at night
> or would you use more gas just getting it up to 64 from say 56?
The only convincing situation I've heard of where "getting it up" is a
cost factor is people with heat pumps that kick in resistance heating
when faced with a strong demand. But they're probably not going to live
in upstate NY.
> What are your thermostat settings,
46F at night (electric mattress pad turned on when needed), 55F daytime,
more if my hands feel cold (wearing warm clothes takes care of the rest
of the body).
> where do you live,
Minneapolis. Probably 5-10F colder than upstate NY where I grew up
(Southern Tier, but depends on exactly where "upstate" means).
> what do you use to heat,
natural gas
>and did you see a savings last year from lowering it at
> night?
I've been doing this for years.
Dave
> I keep my thermostat at 59 from 8am to 5pm and 9pm to 6am.
> From 6am to 8am and 5pm to 9pm the thermostat is kept at 64. Is
> this more frugal than keeping the thermostat set at 62 the entire day?