Posted by OhioGuy on August 14, 2007, 4:40 pm
Our Kodak digital camera died during our recent vacation. I won't spend
more than about $100 for a digital camera. This is because I've had
relatives go on and on about how I just need to spend more money, and then
soon after they have trouble with their $300 digital cameras. For me, it
all comes down to replacement cost. If I get used to spending much over
$100 for a digital camera, the replacement cost gets burdensome. Plus, the
technology is still changing rapidly in this field, so even if a camera
lasted a few years, I'm sure I would get the itch to upgrade.
Unfortunately, nearly all of the digital cameras I've bought over the past
7 years have lasted little more than a year. Some have lasted 8 months,
others a year and a half, but the average is about one year.
This time, I really did my research. Pretty much all of the sub-$100
digital camera reviews I found online were negative, except for those
relating to the HP E427. It's a 6 MP digital camera that is available right
now at Circuit City for $80. The vast amount of reviews for it I found
online were glowingly positive.
Now that I've made up my mind on a replacement camera, I'm wondering if it
would be worth buying some sort of "service protection plan" for it. I wish
Target sold this camera - they have a 3 year replacement warranty they sell
for $19. Unfortunately, Circuit City has just a 2 year one they sell, for
$15. With my history with digital cameras, it would probably die in about a
year anyway.
With my bad luck with digital cameras, do you think it is worth getting
the Circuit City protection plan? Would I be better off finding another
plan, or just passing on it?
Thanks!
Posted by John Weiss on August 14, 2007, 2:49 pm
> With my bad luck with digital cameras, do you think it is worth getting the
> Circuit City protection plan? Would I be better off finding another plan, or
> just passing on it?
Save your $15 or $20. At that price point, if the camera dies, replace it with
a newer/better one.
About the only extended warranties worth it any more are for laptop computers,
when screen protection is included. Of the 4 laptops I've owned, 2 of them
have needed repairs after the standard warranty period (screen for 1, keyboard
and motherboard for the other).
Posted by hchickpea on August 14, 2007, 4:59 pm
> Our Kodak digital camera died during our recent vacation. I won't spend
>more than about $100 for a digital camera. This is because I've had
>relatives go on and on about how I just need to spend more money, and then
>soon after they have trouble with their $300 digital cameras. For me, it
>all comes down to replacement cost. If I get used to spending much over
>$100 for a digital camera, the replacement cost gets burdensome. Plus, the
>technology is still changing rapidly in this field, so even if a camera
>lasted a few years, I'm sure I would get the itch to upgrade.
> Unfortunately, nearly all of the digital cameras I've bought over the past
>7 years have lasted little more than a year. Some have lasted 8 months,
>others a year and a half, but the average is about one year.
> This time, I really did my research. Pretty much all of the sub-$100
>digital camera reviews I found online were negative, except for those
>relating to the HP E427. It's a 6 MP digital camera that is available right
>now at Circuit City for $80. The vast amount of reviews for it I found
>online were glowingly positive.
> Now that I've made up my mind on a replacement camera, I'm wondering if it
>would be worth buying some sort of "service protection plan" for it. I wish
>Target sold this camera - they have a 3 year replacement warranty they sell
>for $19. Unfortunately, Circuit City has just a 2 year one they sell, for
>$15. With my history with digital cameras, it would probably die in about a
>year anyway.
> With my bad luck with digital cameras, do you think it is worth getting
>the Circuit City protection plan? Would I be better off finding another
>plan, or just passing on it?
> Thanks!
Saw a customer in Staples the other day. She was trying to get
satisfaction on the "protection plan" on her digital camera, which had
failed in just a couple of months, and she was going on vacation.
Store rep: "The protection plan only covers you after the
manufacturer's warranty doesn't. The manufacturer warranty is one
year."
Customer: "But the manufacturer wants me to send in the camera and
estimates it will be 8 to 10 weeks for repair, and if it determines
the problem was caused by mishandling, will charge me for the repair.
I thought the protection plan was supposed to cover that."
Store rep: "Sorry."
I think the operative words might not be "protection plan" as much as
"protection racket."
Funny thing is, the store manager and I were overhearing this somewhat
heated discussion while I was in the register line. With that as a
background, he asked if I wanted to buy a "protection policy" on the
electronics I was just buying. ...Uh, no...
Posted by clams casino on August 14, 2007, 5:32 pm
OhioGuy wrote:
> Our Kodak digital camera died during our recent vacation. I won't spend
>more than about $100 for a digital camera. This is because I've had
>relatives go on and on about how I just nee d to spend more money, and then
>soon after they have trouble with their $300 digital cameras. For me, it
>all comes down to replacement cost.
Then keep on replacing cameras. Not frugal, but you get to shop a lot.
We bought a Canon Power Sure Shot 450 about 4 years ago and it continues
to provide us with outstanding pictures.
Then again, you apparently enjoyed a vacation in a $500 69 van. Not my
idea of an enjoyable trip, but to each his own.
Posted by George Grapman on August 14, 2007, 6:10 pm
When a store tries to sell me an extended warranty I say that if ,as
they claim, I really need it they are telling me they have no faith that
the product will last beyond the warranty so perhaps I should not buy
it. The pitch usually stops at that point.
> Circuit City protection plan? Would I be better off finding another plan, or
> just passing on it?