Posted by Al Bundy on August 14, 2007, 6:12 pm
wrote:
> OhioGuy wrote:
> > Our Kodak digital camera died during our recent vacation. I won't spend
> >more than about $100 for a digital camera. This is because I've had
> >relatives go on and on about how I just nee d to spend more money, and then
> >soon after they have trouble with their $300 digital cameras. For me, it
> >all comes down to replacement cost.
> Then keep on replacing cameras. Not frugal, but you get to shop a lot.
> We bought a Canon Power Sure Shot 450 about 4 years ago and it continues
> to provide us with outstanding pictures.
> Then again, you apparently enjoyed a vacation in a $500 69 van. Not my
> idea of an enjoyable trip, but to each his own.
Yea, and every year he buys a $100 camera and takes 100 pictures. He
ain't going to tell us the truth about what it cost himself to
complete that vacation in the van either.
Posted by OhioGuy on August 17, 2007, 10:10 am
> Yea, and every year he buys a $100 camera and takes 100 pictures. He ain't
> going to tell us the truth about what it cost himself to complete that
> vacation in the van either.
Pfft! Yeah, right! We have toddlers, and we take at LEAST 100 pictures a
month - more if we travel anywhere or visit relatives. So perhaps 1,500
pictures a year. We save at least $150 a year in photo developing costs
this way, not to mention we get to look at the pictures right away.
Even if it lasts just a year, I still feel like we've gotten our money out
of it. Of course, I wouldn't mind if it lasted 3 years instead.
Posted by Don K on August 14, 2007, 8:36 pm
> With my bad luck with digital cameras, do you think it is worth getting the
Circuit
> City protection plan? Would I be better off finding another plan, or just
passing on
> it?
The Circuit City protection plan looks out for Circuit City.
You want the OhioGuy protection plan.
Unless you like to play "where's waldo", looking for all the loopholes
that are there in the protection contract, telling you why they won't pay off,
you probably won't know what you've got until it's too late.
Personally I'd rather hold on to the 20 bucks. It's a sure thing. The
extended warranty is a craps shoot.
Don
Posted by Rick on August 15, 2007, 10:21 pm
OhioGuy wrote:
>
> Our Kodak digital camera died during our recent vacation. I won't spend
> more than about $100 for a digital camera. This is because I've had
> relatives go on and on about how I just need to spend more money, and then
> soon after they have trouble with their $300 digital cameras. For me, it
> all comes down to replacement cost. If I get used to spending much over
> $100 for a digital camera, the replacement cost gets burdensome. Plus, the
> technology is still changing rapidly in this field, so even if a camera
> lasted a few years, I'm sure I would get the itch to upgrade.
>
> Unfortunately, nearly all of the digital cameras I've bought over the past
> 7 years have lasted little more than a year. Some have lasted 8 months,
> others a year and a half, but the average is about one year.
>
> This time, I really did my research. Pretty much all of the sub-$100
> digital camera reviews I found online were negative, except for those
> relating to the HP E427. It's a 6 MP digital camera that is available right
> now at Circuit City for $80. The vast amount of reviews for it I found
> online were glowingly positive.
>
> Now that I've made up my mind on a replacement camera, I'm wondering if it
> would be worth buying some sort of "service protection plan" for it. I wish
> Target sold this camera - they have a 3 year replacement warranty they sell
> for $19. Unfortunately, Circuit City has just a 2 year one they sell, for
> $15. With my history with digital cameras, it would probably die in about a
> year anyway.
>
> With my bad luck with digital cameras, do you think it is worth getting
> the Circuit City protection plan? Would I be better off finding another
> plan, or just passing on it?
>
> Thanks!
As Nancy Reagan used to say "Just don't do it!!!" 8-)
All kidding aside I have to really question what the heck you are doing
to those digital cameras that you kill them off every year on average.
Either you have the worst possible luck choosing the worst possible
camera every time, or you are doing something with how you use/handle
them that brings them to a premature death.
I have three of them in a "paid" (not retail price) price range of 80
dollars, 120.00 dollars and 500 dollars. None of them have died. And the
$500.00 one - a five year old Fuji MX2900Z 2.3 megapixel - is still used
*heavily* and still works fine.
That all being said, you are not the person to by an extended warranty.
Because the first rule of voiding an extended warranty is saying to the
customer "you dropped it" and that's where your "protection" ends. With
cameras they will only fix *known* manufacturer defects. And
until/unless/after the manufacturer gets a few thousand calls from
consumers screaming bloody hell about the exact same problem you won't
see any camera repair under extended warranty.
Lap top extended warranties? The favorite way Lenovo voids extended
warranty coverage of late is to claim "water damage" to a lap top. Not a
half gallon of water in the lap top. The dried residue of what might
have been moisture covering less than a quarter centimeter of a board in
the lap top. That may have been deposited there and dried while the lap
top was being assembled... And usually not visible to the naked eye.
Rick
Posted by alex on August 17, 2007, 12:58 pm
Hi
Personally I think the protection plan is a waste of time especially
with electronics, If there is a problem its usually at the beginning
of the items life. Companies know this and thats why they offer these
plans, its easy money for them and very profitable, its all in the
stats
Plus usually this cover is not for accidental damage which is really
what is most likely to cause repairs.
Sales Person "Oh sorry we don't cover accidental damage or wear and
tear it clearly stated in the policy" etc
I would spend the money on buying a bigger memory card.
Regards
Alex
www.HomeLifeWeekly.com
Smart Tips For Your Home Life
> > Our Kodak digital camera died during our recent vacation. I won't spend
> >more than about $100 for a digital camera. This is because I've had
> >relatives go on and on about how I just nee d to spend more money, and then
> >soon after they have trouble with their $300 digital cameras. For me, it
> >all comes down to replacement cost.
> Then keep on replacing cameras. Not frugal, but you get to shop a lot.
> We bought a Canon Power Sure Shot 450 about 4 years ago and it continues
> to provide us with outstanding pictures.
> Then again, you apparently enjoyed a vacation in a $500 69 van. Not my
> idea of an enjoyable trip, but to each his own.