Seerialmom wrote:
>>
>> >I can't speak for rural or suburban communities but in urban areas,
>> >returning items for deposit can be a dreadful chore. These centers are
>> >usually filthy and attract many of the city's homeless into these areas.
>> >Known drug addicts frequent these establishments as well. That is not an
>> >indictment on society's less fortunate but rather a critique of the centers
>> >themselves. Returning cans is often dismissed as being too much trouble and
>> >many do not give their empties to these homeless. That translates to alot
>> >of unreturned deposits, free money for the state. Do you think they
>> >purposely make returning empties as unpleasant as possible in order to
>> >generate revenue?
Around here the homeless scrounge through the recycling containers and pick
cans and bottles up off the street. There used to be a lot of water bottles
(no deposit until recently) lying in the gutter, but no more. Healthy
exercise and what must be a reasonable return or they wouldn't do it, right?
>> We haven't had deposit bottles/cans in my state for the
>> last 2 decades or so. They used to have 'em when I was
>> a kid (1970's) -- used to make some spending money by collecting
>> bottles along the roadside that folks just tossed out.
>>
>> Returning was done at the grocery store. Go to store.
>> Drop off old bottles. Pick up new cases of soda.
>> Quick. Easy. No muss, no fuss, no mess.
>>
>> Do they not do this where you live?
>
> What states don't have deposit bottles or cans? In California the
> plastic liter bottles are 10¢ and cans are 2.5¢ (meaning 2 for 5¢).
> But I agree...as a kid we would look for empty Pepsi bottles and get
> our 10¢; we could buy two Sugar Daddies or Hershey bars with that.
More now -- you can actually make a profit! Last time I got $137 -- I
should really clean up when the truck is full!
----------------------
SACRAMENTO – The New Year brings a greater cash incentive for Californians
to recommit to recycling and preserving the environment. January 1, 2007,
marked the first day of an increase in the cash refund consumers receive
when they take their empty California Refund Value bottles and cans to
recycling centers.
For the first six months of the year, the recycling refund will be larger
than the amount of CRV consumers pay at the checkout stand for most
beverages in aluminum, glass and plastic containers
Legislation signed into law by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger raised the
refund consumers receive from California recycling centers to a nickel for
containers less than 24 ounces and a dime for containers 24 ounces and
larger. For the next six months, the amount of CRV consumers pay at the
store will remain four cents on smaller containers and eight cents on larger
ones.
---------------------
--
Cheers,
Bev
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Non illegitimi carborundum.
What states don't have deposit bottles or cans?
Most don't.
Only about ten or so do.
Don
Wilson wrote:
> I can't speak for rural or suburban communities but in urban areas,
> returning items for deposit can be a dreadful chore. These centers are
> usually filthy and attract many of the city's homeless into these areas.
> Known drug addicts frequent these establishments as well. That is not an
> indictment on society's less fortunate but rather a critique of the centers
> themselves. Returning cans is often dismissed as being too much trouble and
> many do not give their empties to these homeless. That translates to alot of
> unreturned deposits, free money for the state. Do you think they purposely
> make returning empties as unpleasant as possible in order to generate
> revenue?
>
>
i really doubt anyone said "left's make these return centers as nasty as
possible."
In your first line you say it's a dreadful chore, then later you say how
it's "often dismissed as too much trouble"
Sounds like the dregs of society, at least performing some small service
to the community, doing a job that others may not want to do themselves
(if everyone was taking care of their own, there'd be no cans for
homeless to pick up)
>> >I can't speak for rural or suburban communities but in urban areas,
>> >returning items for deposit can be a dreadful chore. These centers are
>> >usually filthy and attract many of the city's homeless into these areas.
>> >Known drug addicts frequent these establishments as well. That is not an
>> >indictment on society's less fortunate but rather a critique of the centers
>> >themselves. Returning cans is often dismissed as being too much trouble and
>> >many do not give their empties to these homeless. That translates to alot
>> >of unreturned deposits, free money for the state. Do you think they
>> >purposely make returning empties as unpleasant as possible in order to
>> >generate revenue?