|
Posted by George on December 10, 2009, 8:27 am
Please log in for more thread options
On 12/9/2009 15:46, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>
>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/18280675/Principles-for-Allocation-of-Scarc ...
>>
>> That's not a link to the health care bill, dumbass. It's a link to a
>> paper
>> that was published in the British medical journal, The Lancet.
>
>>
>> I did not state it was the healthcare bill link
>> we are following Europe , have you noticed?
>
> No, I haven't noticed. Even if we are following
> Europe, I haven't seen any compelling argument
> to believe that's a bad idea. It might be a bad idea;
> it might be a good idea. Running in circles
> screaming "The sky is falling! We're following Europe!"
> does not form a reasoned argument.
>
> Look, if the health care bill is going to
> do the things you say, then it says so somewhere in the
> bill. Quoting unrelated journal articles doesn't support your
> position. Find where in the health care bill that it says
> "government will have access to citizen's bank accounts",
> and you will be more believable. Otherwise, you're just
> fear-mongering.
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>
Hardly fear mongering. It is a critical comment on how bureaucratic,
inefficient and insulting the Federal government is. Congress should be
totally absolutely embarrassed and ashamed of themselves for creating a
work product that absolutely no one can understand.
There is absolutely no reason why the health bill can't be a 20 page
document with tables that clearly define the scope. Anything more is an
insult to us. No one would accept a 650 page mortgage or a 550 page car
rental agreement.
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap